<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.159 (http://www.squarespace.com) on Fri, 24 May 2013 14:16:54 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Daily Feed</title><link>http://www.andrewtolve.com/blog/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:52:50 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace V5 Site Server v5.13.159 (http://www.squarespace.com)</generator><item><title>World Press Photos</title><dc:creator>Andrew Tolve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2013 17:40:07 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.andrewtolve.com/blog/2013/2/21/world-press-photos.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">431146:7349778:32857275</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><a href="http://www.slate.com/blogs/behold/2013/02/20/world_press_photo_2013_awards_announced_for_the_prestigious_international.html" target="_blank"><img style="width: 600px;" src="http://www.andrewtolve.com/storage/World%20Press%20Photo%20winner.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1361469438518" alt="" /></a></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 600px;">First Prize, Sports Action Singles.  Feb. 12, 2012, Batu Sangkar, West Sumatra, Indonesia. Wei Seng Chen/Malaysia.</span></span></p>
<p>When I lived in Paris, my wife and I often picniced in the Luxembourg  Gardens, by the long pool in the mossy shade of oak trees. A bottle of  red wine was a must, plus a warm baguette and fresh cheese, tomatoes,  and fruits plucked straight from the market at Place Maubert.</p>
<p>I was reminded of those delightful outings this morning when I saw  the latest winners of the World Press Photos annual competition. In the  Spring, the Luxembourg Gardens would line all the first, second, and  third prize winners in the various categories on the fence along the edge of the park, and Ali and I would wander by, pausing over our favorites. This year, I have no doubt which one would have held us rapt for the longest.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewtolve.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-32857275.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Will the real literary critics please stand up?</title><dc:creator>Andrew Tolve</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2012 00:31:42 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.andrewtolve.com/blog/2012/8/25/will-the-real-literary-critics-please-stand-up.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">431146:7349778:25400568</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Two interesting stories in the news this month about the importance of literary critics being mean. Or at least showing enough mettle to be critical, rather than purely laudatory of every book they choose to review. The first was by Jacob Silverman in Slate titled "<a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/arts/books/2012/08/writers_and_readers_on_twitter_and_tumblr_we_need_more_criticism_less_liking_.html" target="_blank">Against Enthusiasm</a>." And the second in the New York Times by Dwight Garner, titled "<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/19/magazine/a-critic-makes-the-case-for-critics.html?_r=2&amp;pagewanted=1&amp;hp" target="_blank">A Critic's Case for Critics Who Are Actually Critical</a>." I read both pieces with the pleasure, yet mild frustration, of a man who has been musing over the turn of a phrase for months only to  open up a book and spy it there on the first page, perfectly penned by another writer.</p>
<p>You see, this epidemic of niceness in the literary world these days I find infuriating. It is everywhere&mdash;in book reviews. On the sleeves and back covers of books. In online forums like GoodReads. Granted, some books truly are so brilliant as to be unassailable. The vast majority, however, have low points, sloppy phrases, characters that seem off or ill-defined, plot twists that are inexpertly handled. The margins of my books are scribbled with high praise and curse words, call outs, and cautionary notes alike. At the end of the book, the way those high points and low points counterbalance leads to my ultimate judgement of the book. It is, I feel, a critical part of my job as a writer.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewtolve.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-25400568.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>The ant and the elephant</title><category>Elissa Schappell</category><category>Franklin Park</category><category>Reading Series</category><category>Tin House</category><category>fiction</category><dc:creator>Andrew Tolve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 04:44:03 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.andrewtolve.com/blog/2012/5/15/the-ant-and-the-elephant.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">431146:7349778:16263268</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><br /><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.andrewtolve.com/storage/franklin park reading series.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1337058220832" alt="" /></span></span><br />An ant and an elephant go home together. The next morning the ant wakes up and the elephant is dead beside it. "One night of passion," the ant thinks, "and I spend the rest of my life digging a grave."</p>
<p>That a quote from Elissa Schappell, the co-founder of Tin House who headlined last night at the Franklin Park Reading Series. She had the difficult task of following Robert Lopez, who read two clips from his book Asunder and held the room rapt for twenty straight minutes. But Schappell was equally moving, mixing humor and sadness and anger and pitch-perfect faux British accents as a counterbalance to the very real drama in her story.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"One night of passion, and I spend the rest of my life digging a grave."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>After the reading concluded, I bought both books (Schappell's is the acclaimed "Blueprints for Building Better Girls") and talked with the authors. What a priviledge to live in a city where so many inspiring figures devote their lives to the literary craft. I'm not all about kissing writers' asses, mind you. I left last month's reading series disappointed and unsure if I would return for this month's set of writers. But tonight I was reminded of the great joy that listening to artists share their work in a room of fellow artists can provide.<br /><br /></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewtolve.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-16263268.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Quote of the Day</title><category>Quotes</category><dc:creator>Andrew Tolve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 14:25:37 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.andrewtolve.com/blog/2012/3/28/quote-of-the-day.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">431146:7349778:15626839</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>It's a long one but worth the read. This from <a href="http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/supreme_court_dispatches/2012/03/supreme_court_and_obamacare_why_the_conservatives_are_skeptical_of_the_affordable_care_act_.html" target="_blank">Dahlia Lithwick</a> on what appears to be the impending strike down of the individual mandate:</p>
<p>"This morning in America&rsquo;s highest court, freedom seems to be less about  the absence of constraint than about the absence of shared  responsibility, community, or real concern for those who don&rsquo;t want  anything so much as healthy children, or to be cared for when they are  old. Until today, I couldn&rsquo;t really understand why this case was framed  as a discussion of &ldquo;liberty.&rdquo; This case isn&rsquo;t so much about freedom from government-mandated broccoli  or gyms. It&rsquo;s about freedom from our obligations to one another, freedom  from the modern world in which we live. It&rsquo;s about the freedom to  ignore the injured, walk away from those in peril, to never pick up the  phone or eat food that&rsquo;s been inspected. It&rsquo;s about the freedom to be  left alone. And now we know the court is worried about freedom: the  freedom to live like it&rsquo;s 1804.﻿"</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewtolve.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-15626839.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>World Water Day</title><category>The Big Picture</category><category>World Water Day</category><category>conservation</category><dc:creator>Andrew Tolve</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 14:41:14 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.andrewtolve.com/blog/2012/3/27/world-water-day.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">431146:7349778:15612649</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Water is easy to take for granted in the developed world. We turn our taps and water pours out. We hop in the shower for as long as we like, water our plants, buy case after case of mountain spring water to store in our pantries. Truth is, water is a far more precious resource than the way we treat it, as <a href="http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2012/03/world_water_day_2012.html" target="_blank">these pictures</a> from The Big Picture beautifully illustrate. If we keep on our current path of neglect (I consider myself as guilty as the rest), we too will be setting ourselves up for an uncomfortable future with the most essential of elements.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 600px;" src="http://www.andrewtolve.com/storage/World Water Day 2.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1332859874938" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 600px;">A child bathes from a public tap in his neighborhood in Colombo, Sri Lanka, on March 6, 2012. A UNICEF report says unhygienic conditions cause an estimated 1. 2 million child deaths before the age of five from diarrhea worldwide every year. The report says in urban areas access to improved water and sanitation is not keeping pace with population growth. (Eranga Jayawardena/Associated Press) </span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 600px;" src="http://www.andrewtolve.com/storage/World Water Day 1.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1332859937714" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 600px;">Men bathe on a water pipe above a sewage drain in New Delhi on December 20, 2011. (Kevin Frayer/Associated Press)</span></span></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewtolve.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-15612649.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>The New York Times is marking the days</title><category>Free online content</category><category>New York</category><category>The New York Times</category><category>journalism</category><dc:creator>Andrew Tolve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2012 17:00:18 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.andrewtolve.com/blog/2012/3/23/the-new-york-times-is-marking-the-days.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">431146:7349778:15563654</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><br />Went to open a story on the <em>New York Times</em> today and was greeted by this:<br />&nbsp;&nbsp; <br /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.andrewtolve.com/storage/Nytimes fee.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1332523035429" alt="" width="501" height="215" /></span></span></p>
<p><br />And here was their <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/subscriptions/Multiproduct/lp6128.html?adxc=181564&amp;adxa=295211&amp;page=www.nytimes.com/growl&amp;pos=Left9&amp;campaignId=39UJU" target="_blank">explanation</a>, something about improving their ability to provide top-notch journalism. One thing is clear: If ever there were a doubt that New York's most estimable paper is slowly and surely marching towards a pay-only site, this seems to dispel it. Maybe readers we'll get 2 or 3 free articles a month, if they're lucky. Something about this really bothers me, and that from the perspective of a guy whose living is dictated by the success or failure of these publications. I'm just not sure that charging for content is the way to go. Ultimately everyone might get there; for the time being, I'll resort to the numerous other publications on the web  that don't charge for content and do do a damn fine job covering the news -- politico, salon, slate, bleacher report, etc.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewtolve.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-15563654.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>The underdog</title><category>Associated Press</category><category>Iditarod</category><category>Lance Mackey</category><category>The Big Picture</category><category>journalism</category><dc:creator>Andrew Tolve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 17:15:26 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.andrewtolve.com/blog/2012/3/16/the-underdog.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">431146:7349778:15462713</guid><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="width: 300px;" src="http://www.andrewtolve.com/storage/Underdog.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1332196677094" alt="" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 300px;">A siberian husky is ready to start at the sled dog race (Hendrik Schmidt/AFP/Getty Images) #</span></span></p>
<p>One of my favorite stories I've written is about Lance Mackey, a little known dog musher who was convinced he would win the 2007 Iditarod ... despite the fact that he had never finished in the top 3 of the race and only once had led briefly.</p>
<p>The reason he was so confident was because he had destiny on his side: His dad had won the Iditarod on his sixth try wearing bib number 13. Then along came his brother, who won the Iditarod on his sixth try wearing bib number 13. And 2007 was Lance's sixth Iditarod, for which he had drawn lucky bib number 13.</p>
<p>All of this came back to me this week when I saw a gallery of <a href="http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2012/03/iditarod_trail_sled_dog_race_2.html" target="_blank">amazing photographs</a> from this year's Iditarod. Mackey's story is now tucked away in Iditarod lore. As destiny had scripted, he won the Iditarod on his sixth try in blow-out fashion, like his brother and dad before him. He repeated the feat the next two years. I wrote the story for the Associated Press. Here's a reprint, as the online link seems to have vanished:</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewtolve.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-15462713.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>A new breed of literature</title><category>Kindle</category><category>e-reader</category><category>fiction</category><category>journalism</category><dc:creator>Andrew Tolve</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2012 18:01:19 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.andrewtolve.com/blog/2012/3/7/a-new-breed-of-literature.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">431146:7349778:15336999</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><em>The <span>New York Times</span></em> has an interesting <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/07/books/kindle-singles-genre-between-magazine-articles-and-books.html?pagewanted=1&amp;sq=mini%20books%20journalists%20long%20form&amp;st=cse&amp;scp=1" target="_blank">story</a> up today about a new breed of mini books on e-readers like the Kindle. The article focuses specifically on "Kindle Singles," which are stories that sell for $.99 to $3.00 apiece (apparently the writer gets to set the price) and are generally longer than long-form articles but shorter than books. The novella of nonfiction might be the best way to put it, though fiction writers  like Ann Patchett and poets like Jane Hirshfield are starting to stretch their legs with the form too. Jon Krackauer, Jonathan Mahler, and Mark Bittman have already delved into the medium on the non-fiction side. Interestingly, Kindle Singles only prints original material, it's set up its own editorial board for the pieces, and writers take home 70 percent of the profit. Here's the link to the site:</p>
<p><em><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><a href="http://www.kindlesingle.net/" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.andrewtolve.com/storage/KindleSinglelogo.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1331144060147" alt="" /></a></span></span></em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewtolve.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-15336999.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Hemingway at work</title><category>Hemingway</category><category>fiction</category><dc:creator>Andrew Tolve</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:26:44 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.andrewtolve.com/blog/2012/2/24/hemingway-at-work.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">431146:7349778:15169440</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><br /><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><a href="http://todayspictures.slate.com/20120223/" target="_blank"><img style="width: 490px;" src="http://www.andrewtolve.com/storage/Hemingway%20at%20work.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1330612378871" alt="" /></a></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 490px;">&copy; Robert Capa &copy; International Center of Photography / Magnum Photos</span></span></p>
<p>Slate's got a great collection of Hemingway photos up on its site today. This was taken at his hunting lodge in Sun Valley, Idaho, in 1940, after he returned from his time in Spain. Check the full album <a href=" http://todayspictures.slate.com/20120223/ " target="_blank">here</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewtolve.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-15169440.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>A haircut, from Russia</title><category>Brooklyn</category><category>One Story</category><category>barbershop</category><dc:creator>Andrew Tolve</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2012 14:55:21 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.andrewtolve.com/blog/2012/2/23/a-haircut-from-russia.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">431146:7349778:15156985</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.andrewtolve.com/storage/hair600.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1331579509898" alt="" width="511" height="271" /></span><span class="thumbnail-caption" style="width: 350px;">This is not George's barbershop, nor is it the guy who cut my hair there, nor is it my head of hair, but it looks kind of like the place where I got my hair cut. Credit here goes to Gabriele Stabile of the NYTimes</span></span><br />Ali and I got married in October of last year. In November we relocated  to Brooklyn. In December we moved into our new apartment. In January  Ali's sister broke her neck in Brazil. In February Gina moved in with us  to continue her rehabilitation, which is going incredibly well, but the  point here is this: Forgive me if it's been a few months since I've  gotten my hair cut. Like four or five, but still.</p>
<p>Furthermore, forgive me if all of the context I just mentioned above&mdash;the wedding, the move, the accident, the rehab&mdash;are, in fact, just excuses buzzing around the much deeper, darker existential truth here: I'm terrified to get my hair cut in New York.</p>
<p>When I lived here in college, I got so many bad haircuts, and paid such a fortune for them, that it drove me to extremes: first, to a Latino barbershop down on 103rd street on the Upper West Side; I still remember the place, too, the big green sign, the salsa music inside, and the buzz cut that resulted, so shortly cropped on the sides that I could see my scalp. My stylist left a  little tuft of bangs hanging down out front, proof that she had done what I asked for&mdash;to leave some good length.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewtolve.com/blog/rss-comments-entry-15156985.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>